Art Documentary Reviews

I rate these documentaries by number, 5 being the best. I try to avoid a synopsis of the film, but will point out things that I find either lacking or great about the film as a whole. I know some of them are quite harsh, but they are nothing to the criticisms I lavish on my own artwork. The latest ratings are found at the bottom of the page. I hope these reviews help you choose an art documentary to enjoy.

Pablo Picasso: A Primitive Soul 2004

Another excellent documentary that was presented by A&E on the Biography Channel. The only thing that could have made it better would have been including more film clips. Not my favorite documentary about Picasso, but if you only have an hour and a half it hits the high points. This film has much to recommend it: Interviews with family and friends, film clips of the day, clear depictions of his work, a timeline that is easy to follow, quality narration. Background music wasn't very inspired; but what topped it off for me were the interviews with Sir John Richardson. Frankly, I would love to see a documentary about Sir John Richardson. I could listen to him for hours. Rating 4.5

Paul Klee: The Silence of the Angel 2006

This is an excellent documentary. Although there are no direct interviews with friends or surviving family, there are included many quotes from those who knew him. Included are sturdy, clear, photos of his work and studio film clips of the time. The narration includes both the voice of a male and female which I enjoyed. The background music was thoughtfully chosen. The inclusion of his puppets to introduce the various chapters was unique and I appreciated their inclusion. I admit I am a fan of his watercolors and his process - it speaks to me. His work is clear, strong, and poignant. Rating: 4.5

Artists of the 20th Century: Francis Bacon 2004

Francis Bacon lived till 1992 and yet no friends, family, curators or historians are included in this documentary. I felt the presentation and narration were on the dull side. If you take into consideration the artwork involved I submit that this film is lacking in depth. Again we run into a disjointed presentation and instead of showing triptychs together, they are shown separately. How are the viewers to gain a true understanding of the symbolism and message of the artwork when shown in this manner? A mere sentence or two about his personal life is ridiculous . Who are these people that were so important in his life that they recur continuously in his work? I can recommend this documentary only because it was the only one I could find about the artist. I found it stale. Rating: 1

The Metropolitan Museum of Art: Treasures of the Metropolitan

If you have never been to the Metropolitan Museum of Art, this would be worth your time. Planning your time wisely before you visit is well worth the effort. For those that have visited many times, this documentary is enjoyable as well. What the curators chose as the most notable pieces of each selection was quite interesting. Rating: 3

Landmarks of Western Art: Impressionism and Post Impressionism 1999

"Traces the rise of the impressionist movement and its influence on future artists. This volume features works by Vincent van Gogh, Edgar Degas, Paul Cezanne and Edouard Manet. "

Not awful. Rather short at 50 minutes, but does hit the high notes of the featured artists. The “cutting-edge computer graphics” is probably accurate for its day, but I found it distracting. Just showing the work would have been better. I do like the historians, as they are in many of these documentaries. Rating: 2.5

Hockney at the Tate

Really enjoyed this documentary. I believe a documentary that includes the artist, or friends and family of the artist, make for a more interesting film. This has it all. Sometimes a little too chatty and descriptive, but all-in-all enjoyable and informative. Rating: 3.5

Rothko's Rooms

I would recommend this documentary. It has interviews with family and friends of the artist and although somewhat sad, is also surprising. Color is depressing? Really? On a personal note would have to add the Rothko Chapel in Houston, Texas, to my list of things to see. Thought the builders contradicted themselves concerning the "cafeteria". I was left with the impression that Rothko was definitely mislead on that score. Have to admire someone who would return a big check on principle. Rating: 4.5

Artists of the 20th Century: Marc Chagall

Although rather bland I would recommend this documentary simply because I couldn't find another one. Chagall's paintings are not shown in whole, only in part. This was the most annoying part of the film. Instead of seeing the work as a whole, it was dissected and explained by its parts. Some of my favorite paintings were not even shown. I did enjoy the stained glass and would definitely make a point to stop by the United Nations in New York to see the "Peace Window" if I had the opportunity. It was surprising that there are no interviews with family or friends considering he lived to such an age. It would have improved the film. Rating: 1

P.S. Contacted the United Nations to obtain information about seeing Chagall 's stained glass "Peace Window" and was told that due to the General Assembly Room being renovated it is not available for viewing. (2014) Contacted the United Nations again in July, 2016 and never received any response. Maybe next trip?

Artists of the 20th Century: Andy Warhol

Again a rather bland film, and considering that their are a lot of choices in regard to Warhol, I would still recommend this film. There are items about his life that I haven't found in other documentaries. His family history was quite interesting. But, as usual, no friends or family are included. The explanations of his works are spot-on though and I was intrigued by the pieces they chose to include. Having recently enjoyed one of the hammer and sickle paintings, it was interesting to see other versions on the theme. Rating: 3

The History of Western Art: 2007

This disc includes three episodes: "Gothic Art: Light in the Darkness", "The Renaissance: A New Dawn", and "The Baroque Period: The Age of Splendor." I would highly recommend this documentary if you have never had any art history or if you are interested in an event timeline. I thought it was well written and easy to follow. The local scenery was a nice touch. Rating: 3

The History of Western Art: 2007

This disc includes "The Rococo Era: Reason and Enlightenment," "Romanticism: Passion and Revolution" and "The Impressionists: A New Vision". Again, if you are interested in a timeline of art history this would be a good choice. Rating: 3

Max Ernst: 1991

I would highly recommend this documentary. At an hour and 41 minutes, I admit I felt cheated. The documentary has it all: Information, commentary, interviews, dramatic reenactments, and film clips. I've only seen two documentaries to date I would rate five stars and this is one of them. Rating: 5

Mr. Art Critic: 2007

Okay, I'm throwing you a curve just to see if you're paying attention. This is NOT a documentary. A rather funny little movie starring Bronson Pinchot portraying a Chicago art critic on vacation in northern Michigan. I don't believe anyone would fall asleep on that victorian contraption if there were a bed available, even drunk. I couldn't suspend my disbelief at the drunken scenes. I don't know any real men who go around getting commode-hugging drunk at this age. Perhaps it was a relic of the writer's college experience? But a straight-up wager, now that I could have believed. Would the character have accepted - no. But he doesn't remember agreeing anyway so it wouldn't have changed the storyline. The end is, well, rather sweet. A nice way to get rid of a bowl of popcorn on a rainy Saturday. Because it is not a documentary: No Rating

Discovery of Art: Toulouse - Lautrec: 2007

This documentary includes some photographs, but mostly the work of Henri de Toulouse - Lautrec in stunning color. The narrative is engaging and given with surprising depth of feeling. The amount of time that each piece is on-screen gives the viewer time to evaluate the work without having to pause the program. This is a definite improvement over previously viewed Kulture documentaries. The timeline is easy to follow although it is rather speedily wrapped up at the end. I would have liked more information about his friendships and personal life especially near the end of his short life. I would recommend this documentary. It is 51 minutes long and I watched it three times. If you are at all interested in composition, studying Toulouse - Lautrec is a must. Rating: 4.5

Who the #$&% Is Jackson Pollock? : 2006

Is this a documentary? Yes, but definitely not what I expected. As far as a documentary about Teri Horton, it is lacking. As far as a documentary about Jackson Pollock, it is lacking. But I would say that this documentary is entertaining. The information about acrylic paint in Pollock's studio made my eyes squint. Wait, what? I really enjoyed the gentleman on the floor of Pollock's studio - nice visual. As far as the content you will have to decide for yourself. Rating: 2

Discovery of Art: Maxfield Parrish: 2007

It took me three times to actually stay awake during this documentary. Such an interesting artist and yet this documentary was odd. It is as though the narrator rereads the same paragraph several times during the film. I have that information already, thank you. It seems as though the narration was actually written for a high school term paper instead of a film. This is another one of those films where the narrator discusses one piece but the film shows another. Even though it is the only documentary I could find on Parrish, I can't recommend it. Get a book, it will be more cohesive and informative. Rating: 0.5

Magritte: An Attempt at the Impossible: 2007

I recommend this documentary. It hits most of the high marks for me: good timeline; filmed interviews with the artist and family; and thoughtful narrative and music. The bonus is the way it is presented. Actually using his ideas as part of the film presentation - bravo! The only thing lacking are family historical references. His mother was discussed at some length, but that was all. His compatriots of the day are well documented though. His explanations of his work are limited. Very enjoyable …in a surrealist fashion. Rating: 5

French Impressionism: Modern Art and Manners 1860 - 1874: 1995

This is a filmed lecture series given at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The art expert, Rosamond Bernier, is not only extremely knowledgable about her subject but her enthusiasm is contagious. Very enjoyable 55 minutes. Rating: 3.0

Simon Schama: Power of Art: Disc 1 2006

This disc's timeline starts with Caravaggio and continues with Gianlorenzo Bernini and concludes with Rembrandt van Rijn. I highly recommend this documentary. It is filmed expertly with enjoyable reenactments. The historian Simon Schama delves in-depth into the story of the artists themselves as well as their works. While watching this documentary I felt I gained a better understanding of the real-life drama of the day. I will share that Rembrandt was my favorite part of this disc. Understandable, since at age nine I requested my mother help me make a homemade halloween costume in which I would portray, you guessed it, Rembrandt. Rating: 5

Simon Schama: Power of Art: Disc 2 2006

This program features David, Turner, and Van Gogh. Again, I highly recommend this documentary series. Mr. Schama's exuberant discussion of these works is captivating. The reenactments of Van Gogh can be a little disturbing, but you get a real sense of the seriousness of whatever illnesses he suffered. Rating: 5

Simon Schama: Power of Art: Disc 3 2006

This is the final disc in the "Power of Art" series and tackles both Picasso and Rothko. Since the focus of each artist is generally on only one piece of work you may have to look elsewhere for a more in-depth look at each artist. But, again I found this series engaging and well produced. I did have issue with Schama stating that Rothko had an agreement with the Four Seasons when I understood he had an agreement with the builders to do art for a "cafeteria". Rothko wanted the work seen from all areas and insisted that there would be no walls between his art and the working class. So when he visited the reality of the restaurant, it is no surprise he was appalled and felt duped. (If you want to see an interview watch Rothko's Rooms) He had amazing integrity. You do get the scope of that integrity in this video, but not the whole story. Whatever you do, don't miss the interview at the end with Mr. Schama. It is a delight. Rating: 4.5

Landmarks of Western Art: Romanticism 1999

This disc takes on the task of defining Romanticism: a subjective and emotional approach toward art and its timeline. I appreciated the inclusion of no less than three art historians. The "slick computer graphics" are quite dated but don't detract from the film. Rating: 2.9

The Private Life of a Masterpiece: Masterpieces of the Twentieth Century: 2003

This film is very similar in style to "Simon Schama: Power of Art". The film includes three artists and focuses on only one piece of their work: Picasso's "Demoiselles D'Avignon; Dali's surrealist "The Christ of Saint John of the Cross"; and Gustav Klimt's "The Kiss". I recommend this production. There are other documentaries that more fully discuss the artist's life as a whole, but I enjoyed the limited timeline. Unlike Schama's documentary there are no reenactments. There are various art historians included. This DVD is 2 hrs. 34 min. long which was a very pleasant way to spend the evening. Grab some popcorn. Rating: 4.0

Discovery of Art: Leonardo Da Vinci: 2007

I'm not a fan of this series. The delivery is weak. This film would have been improved if there had been interviews with other art historians. Even some excitement on the part of the narrator would have been a welcome addition. I mean, we're talking about Da Vinci here - GET EXCITED! But no, it is delivered in a bland, theme paper fashion. I'm convinced that the background music was chosen because it was free. I am curious to see if, seven years later, this documentary film maker's work has improved. I am giving this a generous: Rating 1.0

The Great Artists: The Dutch Masters: Bruegel 2006

The new Bosch! Bruegel's work is quite interesting. I personally like his print work more than his paintings. I can recommend this documentary. From the outset you should know there is not much known about Bruegel personally. Thus, it is his work that is discussed. I did like the art historians that are included in this film. I did appreciate the explanation of some of the symbolism of the time and that we would not understand what would have been commonly recognized as such during Bruegel's day. That explains why those who view his work today and interpret his paintings with only a modern eye, unaware of the historical references, may miss the original message. But, if someone today can put a contemporary meaning to them anyway…well, way to go Bruegel. Rating: 3.0

The Dutch Masters: Van Dyck 2006

The documentary includes the judgements of four art historians, which I appreciated. Average film. 50 minutes long. Rating 2.5

The Great Artists: The Impressionists Pissarro 1999

The life of Camille Pissarro, "Father" of the Impressionist movement, is explored in this documentary. I wish it had been longer. I have enjoyed this series of documentaries especially because of the inclusion of art historians in the films. If I would change anything it would be to add more of his personal life and the life of his family. What happened to his six children? I'm interested. Artists don't live in a vacuum. It is not all art all the time. Admittedly, it does feel that way sometimes; but even after painting for 10 hours a day, I still have a life that includes family and friends. So did they. Tell me about it. On a personal note I felt a kinship beyond empathy since I have an eye problem resulting in the same limitation of of only being able to work in studio. I recommend this film. At 50 minutes, it lasts as long as a bag of popcorn. I would easily have sat for 50 minutes more information. Rating: 3.7

The Great Artists: The Impressionists Manet 1999

The art of Frenchman Edouard Manet. I would recommend this documentary simply because the viewer gets to see his work so vividly on the screen over and over for 50 minutes. But the documentary includes art historians, photos, and some short film clips which I appreciated as well. I love the fact that his feelings on being rejected are discussed. The rebellious nature of wanting to paint what you want and your own way, but dealing with the rejection that goes hand in hand - difficult. I watched this film five times. Three because I was so overworked I fell asleep; and two for sheer enjoyment. I recommend this film. Rating: 3.6

Artists of the 20th Century: Henri Matisse 2004

The art of Frenchman Henri Matisse. I would recommend this documentary. It could have been improved with film clips, art historians, more photographs, interviews, and more information about his personal life. All of these films have a rather theme paper feel to them. But, I have no problem with the way this was filmed. The timeline is clear. The artwork is shown in a clear format and given long enough screen time. A duration of 53 minutes. Rating: 3

Joan Miro: Constellations: The Color of Poetry 1994

The art of Joan Miro. I think Miro best describes his work as being born from hallucination…and I think the producer was trying to elicit that feeling of hallucination when he put this bizarre documentary together. Living to the ripe old age of 90 Miro completed an amazing amount of work. So, a documentary retrospective of his work should have included lots and lots of interviews, photographs, family, friends, historians, etc. but unfortunately it does not. Some quotes by the artist, a couple of photos, one short film clip of mostly broken ceramic mosaics. The worst part was the horrible sound quality of the jazz music that provided the score which practically obliterated the narration. No extras to speak of…I will generously say the timeline was useful. Rating: -1

Great Women Artists: Mary Cassatt 2006

The works and life of impressionist painter Mary Cassatt. I think what I found most interesting about this documentary was that Cassatt tightened her work as she progressed. I have to say she got really mixed messages from her father regarding the pursuit of her dreams. It seems as long as she was successful her father was on-board. Ouch. But I suppose given the era, and not marrying, she would have to be successful if his intent was not to financially support her. I don't know if that was the case, it wasn't made clear. I enjoyed this documentary and watched it twice. I wish it had included more photographs. Still in the theme paper mode, and showing just part of a painting and then all of it. Ugh. Just show me the entire painting, then dissect it if you must. But all-in-all I will recommend this documentary. 45 minutes. Rating: 3.2

The Impressionists: Degas 1999

The work of French artist Edgar Degas. Actually, I have already seen this documentary but didn't include it in my list. So I revisited it today. It has a lot to offer. Photographs of the time, personal information including family, friends, and influences, and art historians discussion of his life and work. Fairly straightforward approach to showing his paintings, which I appreciate. A bachelor for life, acerbic, witty, cold….an interesting subject to be sure. A witty retort to Oscar Wilde? Oh to be a fly on that wall. But sorry, that won't come up in this film. Does he love the subject matter he portrays….I'm convinced of the opposite. Although not discussed in this film, why did his brother burn his paintings? It has been suggested that it was the subject matter…revealing to much about the artist himself. A rather sad figure at the end. I recommend this film. 50 minutes. Rating 3.2

Turner in Switzerland 1992

Tracing the steps of JMW Turner in Switzerland. I must say I really enjoyed this documentary. Well done! We follow Turner by way of a current day photographer, which was a really nice touch. I liked the reenactments (only wish there had been more... and fully developed), the footage, the storyline, and quotes. I liked that there were parts narrated by a female and a male. I appreciated seeing the vantage point that Turner used in his paintings. I also appreciated the trouble it must have taken to film. Through some of Turner's sketches you are able to see areas that he visited that were not documented in other ways. It was truly an interesting take on the artist. This documentary is only lacking in two ways: The audio is poor; and for some reason it seems impersonal. Clearly this was not originally in english, but that did not detract at all. In fact, I would have preferred subtitles. Overall very enjoyable and I highly recommend. 45 minutes. Rating 4.6

Paris: Luminous Years 2010

This is an excellent documentary. It has everything. A little disjointed when flipping from one creative form to another, but in doing so places the focus squarely on the community as a whole. Highest recommendation. So enjoyable I will watch it again. It says it is 2 hours long, but on my player it was over 145 minutes. Rating 5+

Mr. Bing and L'Art Nouveau 2004

Another documentary I can recommend. This documentary explores the career of influential art dealer Siegfried Bing. Don't miss the slide show gallery as an option on the menu. Artwork procured from S. Bing that are in museums all over europe are showcased. A rather quick end to a beautiful art form. The beginning of the film starts rather sadly at the end of his life, but this cemetery appears to be the same cemetery shown in the Degas film. Has a lot to offer in only 52 minutes. Rating 4

Portrait of Wally 2012

Another film I recommend. In the mode of a good mystery movie, this documentary explores the court battle concerning Egon Schiele's "Portrait of Wally" which was stolen by the Nazis from Vienna art dealer Lea Bondi. Truly enjoyed her family members talking about their persistent quest for justice. Did they receive justice? Like the documentary "Art of the Steal", this leaves you little with which to respect the culture of the museum industry. Rating 5

The Private Life of a Masterpiece: Renaissance Masterpieces 2003

Another stellar set of documentaries by the BBC. Four films approximately 45 minute each in length concentrate on four iconic renaissance paintings: Sandro Boticelli's La Primavera, Paolo Uccello's The Battle of San Romano, Leonardo da Vinci's The Last Supper and Piero della Francesca's The Resurrection. Each film shows how the pieces were created, the history involved (patrons etc.) I admit I binge-watched the entire thing. I couldn't help myself it was so interesting. I would say the films about La Primavera and The Resurrection were my favorites. Seeing the botched restoration job on the Battle of San Romano made me wince. That it won't ever be viewed together is terribly sad. These films have it all: reenactments, art historians, art conservators, photos, quotes, etc. Rating 5

Frank Lloyd Wright: A film by Ken Burns and Lynn Novick 1998

Even if you saw this documentary when it originally aired on PBS, it is well worth seeing again. Interesting interviews and great footage are a plus. It shines a light on some of his narcissistic characteristics, but he was brave enough to live his life his way. I have met many non-famous people who display the same qualities. He certainly had tragic moments in his life. I admire his tenacity. I found most interesting his willingness to devalue function. For example in the lily-pad space - it leaked. As a functioning office space, it would drive me crazy, but the beauty….well, who would care? Highly recommend. 2 hours 33 minutes Rating 5

Landmarks of Western Art: The Late Medieval World 1999

Again the "innovative computer graphics" is so old school as to be laughable. I'm not sure why this is still listed as a quality of this film. Since these innovative graphics don't detract from the film I won't count it against it. I can recommend this film. Before I rate it I am going to watch it again. Give it a shot, it is only 50 minutes Rating 3

Great Museums: China: West Meets East at the Metropolitan Museum of Art 2007

An inside look at the Metropolitan Museum of Art's sculptures, scrolls, porcelain, and bronze, cloisonné, coromandel and laquer collection. Very nicely done documentary which I recommend. It would be very useful if you are planning a trip to the museum and have chosen to spend time in this section. I highly recommend that you do plan to see this portion of the Metropolitan as it is one of my top three choices. I especially enjoyed the scroll presentation in this documentary. 57 minutes. Rating 3.8

The Desert of Forbidden Art 2010

Occasionally you will find something that surpasses all your expectations. This documentary about Igor Savitsky, the Nukus Museum, and some of the artists whose works are in the collection are the focus of this documentary. This film has everything you could wish for in a documentary: historians, film clips, photos, family members, letters, diaries,…everything. The music and narration are spot-on. The lives of some of the artists are included. Truly heart-wrenching stories that have a similar theme of adversity and censorship. I would add this museum to my list of things to see. My highest recommendation. 1 hr. 20 min. Rating 5+

The Great Artists: The Post-Impressionists: Klimt 2001

I can recommend this film. I have seen it before, but did not review it. I watched it in whole two more times and viewed several sections again individually. I have seen another documentary about Klimt that had additional information, but I haven't reviewed it here to date. This film has a very good timeline and a few good photos. There are some film clips (current day) that are included. Surprisingly there is a lot about the time frame, but not a lot about the artist personally. The independent art historians viewpoints were interesting albeit somewhat cryptic at times. I believe a more straightforward approach from the historians would be better. It's okay…just tell me what you think. Some viewers will not have any background on the subject and cryptic remarks only serve to leave them in the dark. I concede that this might be an editorial issue instead. I was left with more questions than answers, but it was enjoyable and interesting. 50 minutes. Rating 3.4

In A Dream 2008

This documentary is about artist Isaiah Zagar. For more than 40 years he has done some amazing mosaic work in Philadelphia. This documentary explores Zagar's life and family. It documents his work ethic and briefly touches on his process. But his personality and family life are really the focus of this film. I was left wondering about his relationship within the Philadelphia art community. I did like all the mirrors in his mosaics, the viewer becomes part of the work, but I was more intrigued by his drawings. There are documentaries where I feel more focus should be put on the private life of the artist; this film is just the opposite. 1 hr. 20 min. Rating 2.3

The Art of Romare Bearden 2002

I recommend this really, really, short documentary about American artist Romare Bearden. At only 30 minutes long it hits the high points and ticks off most of the items I enjoy seeing in a film documentary. I would have liked to have seen more time spent on his personal life and to have included some family member interviews. But this documentary does a very good job of dissecting his work process. I would have liked the pieces shown to have remained on the screen for a little while longer, but a length of thirty minutes must be rather difficult. Loved the narration and interviews that were included. The film clips were especially intriguing. Rating 3

Romantics & Realists: Delacroix 2000

The French artist Eugene Delacroix is the focus of this documentary. I recommend this documentary. It hits the high points and adds some historical references about Delacroix contemporaries that I found interesting. The art historians are excited to talk about the art and the man, which is refreshing. It did look as though the painting were found in books since they all had some sort of pattern in the image, I can't be sure, but it was distracting. I liked what little family history was given. Delacroix's color theory influence on impressionists and beyond was discussed at the end. I appreciated the inclusion of the one photograph of him, but preferred the portrait that was shown many times. 50 minutes Rating 2.8

Painters Painting 1972

I highly recommend this film. It is all film clips of the artists, their work, and their studios. In their own words, Jasper Johns, Robert Rauschenberg, Andy Warhol, and many others discuss their work. Let me warn you that some of these guys get pretty chatty but it is interesting to hear them. I thought Warhol was quite candid, but the director disagreed with his forthrightness. It happened a couple of times which I found odd. Clearly it was what Warhol believed, so let him talk. Be sure and watch the bonus feature which includes an interview with the director. In this interview he says that this movie was panned by the critics. I'm sure in hindsight they would surely appreciate the effort. I will warn you that the audio is rather poor. The view and counterview was very entertaining. Rather more fun than hearing historians evaluate these artist's work. 1 hr. 56 min. Rating 4

The Mystery of Picasso: Special Edition 1956

I highly recommend this film. This film is of Picasso painting. That's it. Just Picasso painting with music added. I must say that I enjoyed it very much. It was interesting to see him go off track and restart. I thought the "this is what I would do at home" sequences interesting. I did roll my eyes that he thought viewers should know it took five hours to complete one of them. Since it takes me an average of 230 hours to complete a painting I wasn't impressed by the time frame. Actually I would have been more impressed if it had actually taken 3 minutes. I watched it three times and if you are seeking a better understanding of his process, this is the film for you. 1 hr. 15 min. Rating 4

The Great Masters of the Italian Renaissance: Disc 1 2006

Fairly comprehensive series on the artists Raphael, Michelangelo, and Fra Angelico. I did like that I could choose which part of the documentary to watch. This documentary has a very helpful timeline, discussing artists that lived and interacted during the same time frame. That was a nice touch. Very nice context, film clips were well chosen and on the screen long enough to appreciate. I recommend this series. At over two hours long, I did have to watch each section separately but that did not detract from the experience. 2 hrs. 7 min. Rating 3.8

The Great Masters of the Italian Renaissance: Disc 3 2006

Again, this is a comprehensive series of which this is the final disc. It includes the artistic achievements of the Anthony van Dyck, Bernardo Strozzi and Giotto. The last part of this film, Giotto, has a different narrator. The only thing I would change would be to spend more time on each painting in its completed state instead of just showing elements of the painting. It's like showing my arm in a photo and hoping you will recognize me. I would spend more time on the painting as a whole before I would dissect it. I would recommend this series. I binge watched the entire disc, but it is over two hours long and it is easy to watch each section separately if you wish. 2 hrs. 8 min. Rating 3.8

Andy Warhol: Life and Death Disc 1 (includes entire film) 2006

I highly recommend this film. It is what has been lacking in all the other Warhol documentaries to date. Here you will find interviews with his entourage, friends, and family. But, if you want clearer understanding I would recommend seeing a couple of the other documentaries that only explore his art. Together, it works fairly well. I really enjoyed this documentary . I thought the interviews were thoughtful and touching. It does have subtitles, but only small sections. 1 hour and 21 min. Rating 4.5

Mr. Turner 2014

This is not a documentary, so I won't rate it. I'm sorry I can't recommend this film. I found it unbelievably boring. As a spectator sport painting isn't exactly a riveting subject. We think and watch paint dry - not exactly cinematic fireworks. As a full-on film subject, I find it difficult. The actors don't paint really, so you are left with family, friends and colleagues and the interaction between them. Yet, a man of his times, to judge Turner on a moral standpoint I believe to be a waste of time as well. I kept waiting for something to happen - something engaging. I will give it props for costuming, acting, and set design - nicely done. But the story line was boring. Zzzzzz. 2 hours + No Rating

Pollock 2000

Again, not a documentary, so I won't rate it. I can recommend this film. The most interesting part of this film for me is the wrap-up at the end. It states that "Lee Krasner lived for another 28 years during which she managed the Pollock estate and produced the biggest, boldest, most brilliantly colored works of her career, many of them painted in Jackson's studio." That's the part that held my attention..."painted in Jackson's studio". Perhaps that might explain the acrylic paint that was found on the floor? 2 hours + No Rating

Mona Lisa Revealed: Secrets of the Painting 2008

A documentary about Pascal Cotte's SHR photos of the painting and what they revealed. A rather juvenile format, not sure I understand what age group this documentary is intended to reach, but the information is interesting and I can recommend it for that reason. If you like you can skip to the extra feature which lists 26 "reveals" which I felt was the best and most succinct part of the documentary. 56 minutes Rating 3.0

Absolut Warhola 2004

This documentary attempts to understand the work of pop artist Andy Warhol by visiting with family members who still live in villages in Eastern Europe (Slovakia). A rather odd mix of reverence and denial. I hope that the museum has chosen to send the works on tour or loan them out for a fee and use the money to fix the roof? I believe that would be a workable solution to their problem. It is an interesting portrayal of the lives of the people who live there, and entertaining in spots. Uncomfortably long at 1 hr. 20 min. Rating 2

Georgia O'Keeffe 2009

Not a documentary, so I won't rate it. An enjoyable short movie starring Joan Allen as Georgia O'Keeffe and Jeremy Irons as Alfred Stieglitz. Focus is mainly on the dysfunctional and enabling relationship between the two. I have to admit that the opening lines are the best for me. After that, well, it was like most dramas. 1 hours 29 min. No Rating

Between the Folds 2008

This documentary explores the world of modern origami. I admit I was drawn to the minimalist pieces the most, but I appreciate the more intricate pieces as well. I have seen this documentary before and was completely sucked in by the diagrams and found that my reaction has not changed since I saw it last. I was drawn to my uncle's chemistry books for the same reason; because I felt the formulas looked lyrical. Picture it; 6th-grade summer holiday I spent hours copying chemistry formulas in my notebooks for fun. I recommend this documentary. Rating 3.5

Great Women Artists: Frida Kahlo 2001

I will share that although this documentary is full of pertinent information, it is one of those documentaries narrated in a monotone voice and delivered like a ninth grade theme paper. The same paintings are shown many times (as many as four times each). A greater variety of visuals would have been better. I can recommend this documentary. Be sure and have some caffeine first. Rating 2.5

The English Masters: Gainsborough 1996

I can recommend this documentary, though it is entirely too short. Some footage of where Gainsborough lived was a nice touch. A nice balance of paintings to interviews is appreciated. The Reynolds-Gainsborough rivalry is discussed at great length. Some dissent as to whether the painting known as "The Blue Boy" was painted as a response to a statement (or teaching style) by Reynolds, as the dates don't coincide. I enjoyed this documentary and wish it had run an hour longer. I look forward to the rest of the series. 50 min. Rating 3.5

Great Women Artists: Georgia O'Keeffe 2001

A very monotone biographical documentary that explores the career of Georia O'Keeffe. I can recommend this documentary, just don't put your feet up to watch it or it may put you to sleep. I particularly enjoyed the photographs of O'Keeffe. 45 min. Rating 3

The Private Life of a Masterpiece: Masterpieces 1800 to 1850 2003

My experience is that you can count on the BBC to produce an excellent documentary. I recommend this documentary series highly. Francisco Goya's "The Third of May 1808", Eugene Delacroix's "Liberty Leading the People" and Hokusai's "The Great Wave" are the focus in this episode of the series. I appreciated the entire format. The historian in the Delacroix section was particularly enjoyable. Showing how a wood block is made during the Hokusai segment was fascinating. I will add that at the end of the Hokusai segment, I was oddly surprised by the music during the credits. I'm still not quite sure but I think that was a Bond flick theme song made to sound oriental? It was late...that can't be right. Rating 5

Annie Leibovitz: Life Through a Lens 2008

This documentary is a look at the career of photographer Annie Leibovitz. Starting with the influence of her family and continuing with her work at Rolling Stone and Vanity Fair. There are many interviews with those she has photographed and with family members. A well rounded look at the influences in her life and work. I enjoyed the inclusion of several photo shoots which are quite topical. I love her studio at home and was pleased it was included in the film. I appreciated the difference of the photos where she personally chose the subject matter and those she was paid to produce. I can recommend this film. Nice length at 1 hr. 23 min. Rating 4

The Private Life of a Masterpiece: Impressionism and Post Impressionists 2003

I thoroughly enjoyed this documentary. I watched all three at one sitting and was disappointed when it concluded. Three artworks and their histories are the focus: Auguste Renoir's 'Dance at the Moulin De La Galette; Vincent van Gogh's the 'Sunflowers; and Georges Seurat's 'A Sunday on La Grande Jatte'. The Private Life of a Masterpiece series doesn't disappoint. Highly recommend. Rating 5

The Private Life of a Masterpiece: Masterpieces 1851 to 1900 2003

I thoroughly enjoyed and highly recommend this documentary. Thee iconic artworks are examined: Edouard Manet's 'Le Dejeuner Sur L'Herbe'; James Whistler's 'Portrait of the Artist's Mother' and Edvard Munch's 'The Scream'. I watched all three in the same sitting and as usual with this series of documentaries, I was disappointed when it was over. 2 hours 34 min. Rating 5

Superstar: The Life and Times of Andy Warhol 1991

I never tire of films with Andy Warhol as the subject....and yet, he is never truly the subject. Interviewing him must have been a nightmare. The interview that plays through the documentary with Warhol sitting in front of 'Elvis', is mostly the interviewer talking to himself. Warhol never seems comfortable stating an opinion that could be documented. Often attributed to "shyness", I'm not so sure. This film added some interesting personal information not seen in other documentaries from people (friends) who knew him and were supposedly closer to him. If that was possible. I know I will never forget about Howdy Doody. I can recommend this film. 1 hr. 27 min. Rating 3

Arts and Myths: Vol. 2 2006

A compilation of six short documentaries that explore artistic works that includes a Kodiak mask from Alaska, Hopi Kachina dolls, shadow puppets from China, and three more. I wish I had had the time to split this up and watch about two a night. As it was, I watched all six in one sitting and it was a little overpowering. I learned something new with each segment and found them all interesting. I admit, the Kodiak mask was my favorite section. This is subtitled, but that did not detract from the films at all. I can recommend this film. 2 hrs. 36 min. Rating 3.5

National Gallery 2014

This documentary covered more than I expected and was quite enjoyable. I appreciated the behind the scenes view of running the museum. I was interested in seeing the "human factor" which isn't included very often. Also the struggles with financing was interesting as well. I recommend this film. 3 hours. Rating 3.5

The Private Life of a Masterpiece: Masterpieces of Sculpture 2003

The BBC rarely disappoints. This series is no exception. The documentary is split into three films focusing on three artistic works beginning with Michelangelo's David, continuing with Edgar Degas 's Little Dancer, and ending with Auguste Rodin's The Kiss. Easy and entertaining to watch. If needs be, you can split your viewing time up to fit your schedule. I've had this one for literally months before having the opportunity to finish it. I recommend this film. 2 hrs. 34 min. Rating 4.5

Art of the Heist 2006 - 2014

I have thoroughly enjoyed this series and have been sharing it with my better half. This is about solved and unsolved art related crimes. It is a little outdated as some of these have been solved since being produced, (you can google it after watching) but it is no less enjoyable as a mystery/whodunit. I am quite interested in the interviews with those involved in these crimes. I also don't get why museums have such ridiculously low security for objects worth so much money. Really? You'll pay 30 million for a painting but can't bother to have proper security. Please. Now you know why they can't afford the insurance, because their security is so lousy. It goes that if you have decent security, you can afford the insurance. Just saying. But, I will give a pass to the gentleman who inherited artwork and couldn't afford insurance. Not the same thing at all, and I was happy he recovered his property; but sad that he felt he had to sell it. Fascinating peek into the "underbelly" of the art world. (Since I could actually get someone interested in watching this besides me, I'm giving it a pretty high rating for basically police procedure films.) About 3 hours long on each of the five discs. Rating 4

L. S. Eldridge